Endpoint Management: Unified Solutions Aren’t There Yet

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solutions have not yet fully bridged the functional gap with ad hoc tools.

Gartner highlights this shortfall in the first Magic Quadrant it has dedicated to this market. The gap appears in terms of reliability, speed, and granularity, the American analyst notes. As a result, a common buyer pattern remains to combine tools to cover all needs.

There is also room for improvement in Autonomous Endpoint Management (AEM). For now, the focus is on automating patching; in the coming years, Gartner expects expansion into configuration management and the implementation of policies and strategies.

18 Vendors, 8 “Leaders”

The principal functional criteria that vendors had to meet to be included in this Magic Quadrant (as of August 1, 2025) were:

– Availability of a SaaS version
– Management, with or without an agent, of Windows, macOS, iOS/iPadOS, and Android
– Native support for device enrollment/provisioning, application deployment, update management, and the application of configurations/policies
– Role-based access control

Managing Chrome OS, Linux, or IoT was not mandatory. Nor was providing MDM/MAM components, DEX (managing the digital employee experience), or ITSM/CMDB integrations. An enterprise app store was also not mandatory. The ability to automate patching of third‑party apps and to customize reporting were similarly not mandatory requirements.

En complément des critères fonctionnels, il fallait couvrir au moins 5 millions d’endpoints actifs, hors offres gratuites (trial periods, freemium, etc.). Addigy, Applivery, Automox, Fleet, Hexnode, Iru, Matrix42, and Scalefusion did not meet this threshold. Gartner nonetheless gave them an “honorable mention.”

The 18 vendors are ranked along two axes. One is the “Execution” axis, reflecting the ability to actually meet market demand (customer experience, product/service quality, etc.). The other axis focuses on the vendors’ strategies (go-to-market, marketing, vertical strategy, geographic reach, etc.).

Execution axis standings:

Rank | Vendor
1 | Microsoft
2 | Tanium
3 | NinjaOne
4 | HCLSoftware
5 | Jamf
6 | Omnissa
7 | Adaptiva
8 | ManageEngine
9 | IBM
10 | 42Gears
11 | Ivanti
12 | Atera
13 | N-able
14 | Kaseya
15 | Google
16 | Absolute Security
17 | Samsung Electronics
18 | Raynet

Vision axis standings:

Rank | Vendor
1 | Tanium
2 | Omnissa
3 | Microsoft
4 | Adaptiva
5 | Ivanti
6 | HCLSoftware
7 | IBM
8 | NinjaOne
9 | Jamf
10 | Atera
11 | ManageEngine
12 | 42Gears
13 | Absolute Security
14 | N-able
15 | Kaseya
16 | Raynet
17 | Samsung Electronics
18 | Google

Adaptiva, Best Known as a Complement to Microsoft Solutions

With its OneSite offering (per‑device licensing), Adaptiva is praised for its automation capabilities and, more broadly, for the scale at which it can operate, including peer-to-peer delivery and integration with enterprise tools. Its broad network of publisher partnerships (CrowdStrike, Microsoft, SentinelOne, Tenable, and others) is viewed positively, as is the roadmap that appears well aligned with demand.

However, while Adaptiva is well known as a companion to Microsoft ecosystems, its standalone version does not enjoy the same level of recognition. It’s also important to note the absence of native MDM for Android and iOS; for supported platforms, device enrollment must go through a local client. Additionally, Adaptiva is transitioning toward a primarily indirect sales model, a move likely to constrain its near‑term growth.

HCLSoftware’s SaaS Is Not on Par with the On‑Prem Version

HCLSoftware has integrated its BigFix Workspace+ offering (per-user or per-device licensing) with a broad array of IT Operations (ITOps) and security/identity management solutions (Azure, Qualys, Rapid7, ServiceNow, Tenable, and more). Gartner also highlights its reseller and MSP ecosystem and its solid financial health (substantial margins, steady growth across several segments), all of which help reduce risk for end customers.

The SaaS version does not yet match the on‑premise version: some features or modules available in one deployment aren’t fully configurable in the other. In terms of user experience, the UI and configuration options aren’t universally praised. Also, watch for potential license model changes as HCLSoftware shifts toward a “service as software” approach.

IBM, More Expensive and Less Focused

In its MaaS360 offering (per-user and per-device licensing), Gartner notes the spread of GenAI and machine learning for threat detection and strategy recommendations. It also commends IBM’s global coverage of its teams and deployment flexibility, as well as features such as risk scoring and continuous compliance, which support autonomous management.

However, MaaS360 remains relatively unknown outside the MDM space, and IBM has not made it its main focus. The vendor does not target specific personas and its pricing sits above the average for this Magic Quadrant’s vendors.

Jamf, Still Heavily Apple-Centric

The Jamf solution (per‑device licensing) is widely regarded as the gold standard for Apple device management. Functionally, it excels in macOS coverage, and Gartner also admires the engaging content and the breadth of delivery channels surrounding the offering.

Nonetheless, the Apple‑centric focus has constrained growth potential and created a degree of dependency. Jamf has opened to Android, but this shift is recent. As of the latest assessment, the company is not profitable on GAAP accounting standards.

Microsoft Reliability Issues

Intune has become the default choice for many Microsoft customers. Its strong brand is reinforced by the sheer volume of Microsoft content on the topic, plus the vendor’s broad global workforce and its deployment flexibility, including data localization and support options.

Like IBM, Microsoft does not target personas. End users report recurring latency in reporting, policy synchronization, and app deployment. There is also a notable learning curve with Intune and potential challenges when troubleshooting the solution.

AI, Not Yet Widely Deployed at NinjaOne

NinjaOne Endpoint Management (per‑device licensing) is priced below the market average. Its bundles are well suited to large enterprises and MSPs alike. Gartner also commends the high level of customer success resources (customer success managers, extensive self‑service resources) and the generally positive user feedback regarding ease of use. The company has seen strong growth in its personnel and customer base, culminating in a $500 million funding round in early 2025.

Historically focused on MSPs and the mid‑market, NinjaOne is evolving to reach larger enterprises through platform enhancements, additional integrations, and channel development. There is still work to do to raise awareness of its solution, and AI adoption remains limited within the product at this stage.

Omnissa Lacks Reference Customers

Omnissa’s Workspace ONE UEM (per‑device or per‑user licensing) is deemed mature, with strong automation capabilities across the leading OS families. Gartner also highlights its sector-focused strategy reinforced by targeted integrations. Omnissa is notable for being the only “Leader” in the MQ for terminal management and also holding that same position in the MQ for DEX (digital experience management), a combination it leverages.

Despite these strengths, the offering is relatively expensive, and Omnissa does not target user personas. Its website lacks prominent logos and case studies, which can complicate evaluating the solution. It’s also important to recall that the business was disrupted when Broadcom took control in 2023 and was subsequently sold to the KKR fund in 2024.

No Native MDM in Tanium

Tanium Endpoint Management (per‑device licensing) highlights autonomous management as a differentiator, both in terms of the product and the content published by the vendor. The company is generally profitable, holds the necessary certifications, and has broad geographic coverage with flexible hosting options.

Recently repackaged, the offering carries a price tag higher than the average. It does not include native MDM (and does not integrate with Intune). On macOS, it does not adopt Apple’s modern management approach, which can limit automation and elasticity.

Note: This translation preserves the article’s factual content and structure while adapting the language for an English-speaking audience. The aim is to maintain the original’s detailed information and subsections, including tables and bullet points, in a fluent and accessible English narrative.

Dawn Liphardt

Dawn Liphardt

I'm Dawn Liphardt, the founder and lead writer of this publication. With a background in philosophy and a deep interest in the social impact of technology, I started this platform to explore how innovation shapes — and sometimes disrupts — the world we live in. My work focuses on critical, human-centered storytelling at the frontier of artificial intelligence and emerging tech.